4/4/2025, 3:31:30 PM 星期五
Geological Disasters Risk Assessment of Ground Gathering and Transportation Gas Pipeline in Puguang Gas Field
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Exploration Technology,CAGS,Sichuan Institute of Geological Engineering Investigation,China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Zhongyuan Oilfield Puguang Branch,Institute of Exploration Technology,CAGS

Clc Number:

P642

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [16]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    It is inevitable for long-distance oil and gas pipelines to go through the areas with complex terrain and geological conditions, where are often high-risk areas of geological disasters, and different types of geological disasters threaten the pipelines safe operation in different ways. Taking the risk assessment case of Puguang gas field ground gathering and transportation gas pipeline, (1)Establishing the risk assessment model and evaluation index system of regional pipeline geological disasters. (2)Completing the risk assessment of geological disasters for gas pipeline, dividing the risk of geological disasters along the pipeline into 5 grades from high to low risk zones. (3)According to the zoning results of the geological disaster risk assessment, the pipeline geological disasters risks are divided into 50 risk sections, including 2 highest risk sections, 14 high risk sections, 20 medium risk sections and 14 low risk sections. The evaluation results are coincident with the actual situation, which provides important auxiliary decision-making for prevention and control of geological disasters along pipeline and give reference for regional pipeline geological disasters risk assessment.

    Reference
    [1]王其磊.长输管道地质灾害定量风险评价技术研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2012:2-3.
    [2]魏良帅,舒勤峰,王佃明,等.普光气田地面集输工程地质灾害调查评价报告[R].成都:成都华建勘察工程公司,2017:2-42.
    [3]黄润秋,许向宁,唐川,等.地质环境评价与地质灾害管理[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:129-153.
    [4]吴彩燕,王青.山区灾害与环境风险研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:1-24.
    [5]王萌,乔建平,吴彩燕.基于GIS和本底因素贡献权重模型的区域滑坡危险性评价——以重庆万州为例[J].地质通报,2008,27(11):1802-1809.
    [6]吴森,李虎杰,张魁,等.高程因素对平昌县滑坡灾害发育的敏感性分析[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2015,37(4):62-66.
    [7]Wang M,QIAO J P,He S M.GIS-based earthquake-triggered landslide hazard zoning using contributing weight model[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2010,(7):339-352.
    [8]WU S,Wu C Y,Li H J,et al.Regional landslide risk assessment based on GIS and contributing weight model — A case study of Wenchuan county[C].Kaifeng: International Conference on Geoinformatics. IEEE,2013:1-7.
    [9]Wang M,QIAO J P.Reservoir-landslide hazard assessment based on GIS: A case study in Wanzhou section of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2013,10(6):1085-1096.
    [10]吴森,张占成,周光红,等.基于贡献率模型的汶川县滑坡灾害的易损性评价[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(3):69-74.
    [11]汤国安,杨昕.ArcGIS地理信息系统空间分析实验教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:248-283.
    [12]汤国安,刘学军,闾国年.数字高程模型及地学分析的原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:207-231.
    [13]操丽,邓清禄,耿丹,等.基于GIS与模糊逻辑法的川气东送管道地质灾害危险性评价[J].安全与环境工程, 2013, 20(6):38-42.
    [14]荆宏远,韩冰,吴张中,等.油气管道地质灾害风险管理技术规范:SY/T 6828-2011[S].北京:国家能源局,2011:6-18.
    [15]康婧,王伟伟,程林等.. 基于模糊数学方法的海岛地质灾害风险评价——以长兴岛为例[J]. 海洋环境科学,2016,35(06):861-867.
    [16]王翔宇. 甘肃省线性工程地质灾害风险评价[D].兰州大学,2013.
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1089
  • PDF: 1004
  • HTML: 234
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 18,2018
  • Revised:July 18,2018
  • Adopted:July 27,2018
  • Online: September 30,2018
Article QR Code