4/4/2025, 4:45:11 AM 星期五
基于黄河冲洪积地层试桩试验优化 桩基承载力设计的研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队,山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队,山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队,山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队

中图分类号:

TU473.1


Study on design method of pile foundation bearing capacity based on pile test in the Yellow River alluvial and pluvial formation
Author:
Affiliation:

Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development 801 Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Brigade,Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development 801 Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Brigade,Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development 801 Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Brigade,Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development 801 Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Brigade

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以山东东营某工程为例,基于黄河冲洪积地层试桩试验成果,对试桩试验、试桩单桩极限承载力实测值与预估值相差较大(6.36%~20.19%)的原因进行分析。建立在相同桩顶标高(-5.7 m)条件下单桩极限承载力实测平均值与桩底标高(可以换算成桩长)的关系曲线,对工程桩桩基承载力设计方法进行优化。根据桩基检测结果,优化后的工程桩在相同桩长、桩径条件下单桩极限承载力实测值与预估值承载力相比提高约10%,达到发掘地质条件的潜力、减少桩数、节省工程造价的目的。相关试验方法、优化桩基承载力设计的方法可为类似地质条件的工程设计及建立区域桩基承载力数据库提供借鉴。

    Abstract:

    Taking a project in Dongying as an example, based on the test results of pile test in the Yellow River flood alluvial formation, the relation curve between the measured average value of the ultimate bearing capacity of single pile and the height of the pile bottom (which can be converted into pile length) under the condition of the same pile top elevation (-5.7m) is set up. The difference between the test pile test and the measured value of the ultimate bearing capacity of the single pile is quite different from the predicted value. The reasons and the optimal design method of pile foundation bearing capacity are introduced. According to the test results of the pile foundation, the measured value of the ultimate bearing capacity of the single pile under the same length and diameter of the pile is about 10% compared with the predicted bearing capacity, which can achieve the potential of excavating the geological conditions, reducing the number of piles and saving the cost of the project. Relevant test methods and methods of optimizing pile bearing capacity design can provide reference for engineering design under similar geological conditions and the establishment of regional pile bearing capacity database.

    参考文献
    [1] 周广宗.桩基静载试验在省道248改建工程中的研究应用[D].山东大学,2009.
    [2] 吴群昌.西安地区钢筋混凝土钻孔灌注桩试桩试验研究[J].城市勘测,2014,(4):172-176.
    [3] 柯洪,吴翔,王继华,曾云川,赵春宏,冯庆高.天津厚地层超长钻孔灌注桩单桩承载特性研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(9):2821-2826.
    [4] 王申.桩基静载荷试验实例分析[J].价值工程,2015,34(31):111-113.
    [5] 王美云,顾国荣,陈晖,徐枫.某桩基工程优化设计实例[J].勘察科学技术,2004,(6):41-42,48.
    [6] 孙宏伟.京津沪超高层超长钻孔灌注桩试验数据对比分析[J].建筑结构,2011,41(9):143-146.
    [7] JGJ106-2014建筑基桩检测技术规范[S].
    [8] 祝磊,孔思丽,曹小兵.某钻孔灌注桩基静载荷试验分析[J].贵州工业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,34(4):84-87.
    [9] 姚泽良. 竖向荷载作用下单桩极限承载力计算方法的研究[D].西安理工大学,2003.
    [10] 贺诗选,张娇,李强.根据试桩成果反分析灌注桩的设计参数[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程),2012,39(8):61-64.
    [11] 王文鹏,张小东.曹妃甸某大型工程钻孔灌注桩试桩施工及检测结果分析[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程),2011,38(07):57-62.
    [12] 孙宏伟.京津沪超高层超长钻孔灌注桩试验数据对比分析[J].建筑结构,2011,41(9):143-146.
    [13] 樊清禄.桩基静载荷试验方案的对比[J].山西建筑,2017,43(36):76-78.
    [14] 陈红玲,曹庆霞.桩基优化设计经济效益分析[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程) ,2014,41(7):70-72.
    [15] 陈红玲,曹庆霞.桩基优化设计经济效益分析[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程) ,2014,41(7):70-72.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

黄薛,曾纯品,雷炳霄,等.基于黄河冲洪积地层试桩试验优化 桩基承载力设计的研究[J].钻探工程,2019,46(2):75-79.
HUANG Xue, ZENG Chunpin, LEI Bingxiao, et al. Study on design method of pile foundation bearing capacity based on pile test in the Yellow River alluvial and pluvial formation[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2019,46(2):75-79.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1168
  • 下载次数: 945
  • HTML阅读次数: 273
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-11
  • 最后修改日期:2018-08-11
  • 录用日期:2018-10-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-01-31
文章二维码